BCTF Response to Ministry of Education FACTS in the INFORMATION BULLETIN
(ODN is glad to publish this but unfortunately not in the same format as received – note format)
Original Claim – BCTF
FACT: from Ministry of Education
BCTF Response: from Teachers
Claim: 700 fewer Special Needs teachers
FACT: 2,100 additional special needs teaching assistants in B.C. classrooms.
BCTF Response – analysis of ministry data shows that since 2001-02 there are:
2,601 fewer FTE teachers, including a loss of 752 FTE Special Education teachers 2,029 more FTE Education Assistants in all programs, including Special Education
Education assistants replacing teachers is not adequate for special needs students.
Claim: Ninth-best paid in Canada
FACT: B.C. teachers’ salary plus benefits is fourth-best among provinces.
BCTF Response – uses current salary figures (2011-12) for Category 5 (5 years of university) and Category 6 (master’s degree) from salary grids in teacher collective agreements across Canada. Based on this comparison:
The maximum salary for a BC teacher with Category 5 qualifications ranks 9th in Canada, including the provinces and territories.
Based on provinces only, the rank shifts to 6th among the ten provinces.
BCPSEA uses out-dated data and manipulates the rankings by comparing a teacher at Category 4 (only 4 years of university) salary with fewer qualifications, in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Quebec, to a BC teacher with Category 5 qualifications.
Claim: Seniority eroded under Bill 22—Education Improvement Act
FACT: Seniority remains key factor but qualifications also considered. Math teachers teaching Math; Science teachers teaching Science.
BCTF Response: Existing contracts already provide for qualifications and experience to be considered first, before seniority. The government knows this, and is willfully distorting the criteria for hiring.
Claim: Contract demands are reasonable
FACT: A 15 per cent wage increase at a cost of $2 billion is completely unreasonable, given the current economic reality.
BCTF Response:The ministry is exaggerating the cost of a salary increase by five times the actual cost.
Even BCPSEA estimates the cost of a 15% salary increase over 3 years at $431 million, according to their February 27, 2012 Information Sheet. Teachers across Canada have negotiated salary increases to cover the cost of inflation. Why is it only the BC government that claims they cannot afford a cost of living increase for teachers?
Claim: Eliminated class sizes
FACT: Class-size caps on all grades with exceptions made by principals and superintendents.
BCTF Response:Bill 22 –
Removes the involvement of teachers in the organization of their classes by repealing the requirement for teacher consultation.
Ensures larger classes in Grades 4 to 7 because it removes the previous requirement of teacher consent.
Removes parent involvement in the organization of classes by repealing the requirement that the principal consult with parent councils about class size at the beginning of the school year. Eliminates public transparency and accountability by repealing the requirement that the superintendent provide a report to school trustees in a public meeting about class sizes in the district.
Claim: Reject net-zero wage mandate
FACT: 130 net-zero contracts signed. 25,000 CUPE employees signed net zero contracts.
BCTF Response: Between November 2010 and July 2011, BC Bargaining Settlements Bulletins shows 36 municipal and federal public sector settlements in BC with annual wage and salary increases ranging from 1% to 3% for 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Claim: Teachers have not been fairly compensated
FACT: Teachers received a 16 per cent wage increase; $3,700 signing bonus for their last contract.
BCTF Response: If BC teachers do not receive a salary increase for 2011–12, a Vancouver teacher at maximum salary (Cat. 5) will earn: $13,529 less than an elementary teacher in Toronto,
$14,463 less than a secondary teacher in Ottawa,
$21,001 less than a teacher in Edmonton
Claim: 12,000 overcrowded classes
FACT: Of 65,000 classes, fewer than 1,500 have more than 31 students. Fewer than 600 have more than 33 – most of these are band, choir and theatre.
BCTF Response: Bill 22 removes – The limit of three students designated with special needs per class. The right of teachers to be consulted about classes with more than 30 students.
Class size issues need to be put into the context of class composition – the more complex the needs of students, the more difficult it is to meet the needs of all, especially when classes are over-crowded.
Ministry statistics show: 3,627 Grade 4 to 12 classes with more than 30 students in 2010-11.
12,240 classes exceeded the legislated limit of 3 designated special needs students in 2010-11.
Updated salary comparisons:
http://bctf.ca/uploadedFiles/Public/Publications/ResearchReports/2011-TS-02.pdf